[2024-06-26 Wed 08:28] * Retraice ** [source] # Generated by working results of # =cat re-publicfeed-to-Re117.txt | grep -i ''= # or similar. #+begin_src shell pending re-run. See Margin above. #+end_src ** [PLANNED] *** Is it reasonable to monitor your own log files? # <2023-12-30 Sat 13:17> *** WDWD? # <2023-12-30 Sat> Signal notes from AJ meeting at Starbucks today, 10:50 to # 11:40 AM, and car ride before, 10 min or so. **** Why the question? Despair/fear from computing, AKA AI-doom **** Vague notions - Bill Maher: be the BM of this problem, adding humor to the necessary intellectual work of news gathering and analysis (What’s GOOT). - Roads, pick axes: build roads for tourists, pick axes for explorers (gold rushers)? - Refugee crisis or malady or...?: - What you can do about it? / What's GOOT > WDWD **** WDWD? ***** Notes Computers are tools for doing intellectual work. Robots are for most other work. Don’t assume that the solution to the AI-doom will be computing. - Decentralize; diffuse power. - Don't risk creating more competitors (capability gains in power seeking, autonomy, replication) - Spread out; Zubrin - Use the Free tools instead of the paid tools? - Harden, prep, over-engineer. - Strategic point: no one who believes they'll gain from the enormous upside of AI will resist the current path, or all will bolster it. - humans are ladder kickers ***** Reddit post https://www.reddit.com/r/samharris/comments/13bkrzl/comment/jjbq866/ #+begin_quote Glad you posted this. I think you represent a large and growing share of humanity, for the obvious reasons you state. tl;dr: There are different ways to think about your own, and our collective, situation. Things that help me: 1. Think of how much better off you are than the vast majority of humanity, who either have no idea what's happening with AI, or know but have many fewer options than you do (think: 3rd world). But do NOT then start thinking about how to help those people. Put on your own mask first. 2. Keep firmly in mind how silly you're going to feel, 20 yrs from now, if Yudkowsky and Bostrom are wrong, and you've pissed away time and energy on hedonism. (Also, 33 is not too late for anything. "A person who is [my age] can't do X" is usually more an expression of fear than belief. Look for the myriad counterexamples to shake yourself loose.) 3. Keep firmly in mind that human success in a cold, dark, hostile universe, and then on a cut-throat planet of things ALMOST as smart as us, was very, very unlikely, which means we have some track record of succeeding against unfavorable odds. Then think of how long we've had nuclear weapons, and yet controlled them. Same point. 4. Note that it wasn't intelligence alone, but thumbs and inclusive genetic fitness and cooperation and competition and maybe the advantages of carbon molecules over silicon molecules in an Earth-like environment that lead to our success. But do NOT then start looking for holes in my argument there; it was not an argument, it was a claim of knowledge, and knowledge is never really certain. 5. Take heart that death by Yudkwoskian 'ignition of the atmosphere' because something something "you are made of atoms" will be a quick, relatively good death compared to, say, the deaths currently happening in Ukraine, or at the hands of clever psychos the world over who know exactly how to find victims, torture them, kill them, and get away with it, year after year, generation after generation, since primates began. But do NOT start reading about this subject. Own mask first. 6. Follow the people on Twitter who substantively argue with Yudkwosky. And listen to more of Stuart Russell, who is smarter than Yudkwosky (says I) and yet totally open to the AI x-risk possibilities, but in a way that is constructive and solutions-oriented, instead of Yudkwosky's condescending-but-here-to-save-the-world-even-though-it's-now-hopeless-based approach. Russell has an audience with the productive, capable people of the world; Yudkwosky not so much. 7. Play with computer programming (assuming you don't yet). It will show you how much power you, individually, have, if only you can get past the inhibitions blocking you from learning to use the latest human inventions. Think of every new AI tool as a new product at Home Depot. What does it do? Need that? Want that? Grab it! It's free (usually)! ... However, if it's labeled "Boston Dynamics" and it starts walking toward you, walk away. 8. Keep careful track of how many times the sun rises, how often, and the causes of it. Try to extrapolate based on that, even though we all know it can't go on forever. 9. Listen to Dave Chappelle, or your favorite comedian. Not their thoughts on AI... their thoughts on anything. Laughter is involuntary and completely defeats misery, if temporarily. This is why they tell so many jokes in war zones, like Ukraine. I'll stop, but the list goes on. #+end_quote ***** Engineer Retraice to help refugees become immigrants Engineering Retraice to find AI doomers and deliver to them tool knowledge and better thoughts. - mapping past segments - feedback first (make decisions focused on evidence, no matter how little) - planning future segments around WDWD - re-launch pile of segments Refugees want to be immigrants. - be an immigration attorney - be a Home Depot guy - be a Bill Maher People want to get to the promised land, then build a house, then sit inside when it's raining and laugh with their friends. Hardware store: Stay away from tradies, who know more than you. You annoy them, their annoyance discourages you. ***** What does the future look like? Are humans at the command line? # <2023-12-30 Sat 23:12> Signal ***** It’s not machines, but bad guys and bad machines; it’s not bad machines, it’s bad artifacts (tech) and ideas (black-ball knowledge) <2023-12-31 Sun 08:40> _Tech-nology_ ... it’s tech, the art and artifacts, and knowledge, the ideas. <2023-12-31 Sun 16:10> # <2023-12-29 Fri> Signal: #+begin_quote 09:03 Computer control land migrant: - all major OSes - editors - shells - C, Python, source (text) basis - streetwise security (no keylogger, screenwatecher, e.g.) 17:18 Digital natives are actually digital native slaves to what was built to enslave them. The digit indigenous are the controllers before the conquest. #+end_quote # Today, <2023-12-31 Sun> Signal: #+begin_quote 09:43 Bad on front, change machines to... Tech? Artifacts? Knowledge? Automata? 10:57 Is totalitarian control inevitable? We either have to see disaster before we democratically agree (too late, if AI or biotech), or elite smarts will foresee, maneuver into totalitarianism to prevent. Is it a dilemma between totalitarian control and technological doom? 13:01 Understanding the behavior of rsync makes me not want to add any new `creatures' to my operation. Is it like a farm? If run by one guy plus a family, you only want dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, but not useful frogs or made-friendly bacteria, because more complexity requires more consciousness? Without the consciousness, the complexity leads to strange undesirable defaults, basins of valueless attraction? 13:02 So, simplifying /what one has introduced/ is necessary if no new conscious entities are available to help; though the complexity of pre-existing environment to which one has adapted is arbitrary and doesn't require simplification. 13:20 Protective Ideas: people don't change much; ideas do; tech is just ideas; as tech ideas change, new protective ideas need to be built so we get the upside and not the downside. #+end_quote ***** What has happened in your time, so far? WSYD? (What should YOU do, now?) <2023-12-31 Sun 16:56> The world has gone from rudimentary computers and internet, through desktop Windows, Apple and Google, to mobile iOS, Linux and ChatGPT. This is break-neck change. By swimming against the current of computing, your have been trying to cope, to grasp some understanding of a tectonic change in how humans busy themselves. Soon, your window will close. Is the USB stick website correct? Think of the massive role of: advertising, drugs, entertainment, mass media. Your value; another way to think about it: _What computer problems can you now solve, for whom?_ Immigration lawyer, tool guy, ... but one who hasn’t helped himself. Except I wouldn’t be saying, ‘get a job like I did’, or ‘like I could’, I’d be saying... what? The refugee-immigrant view is the dark, pessimist. What about the optimist view? The economic growth that tech has so far produced? The medicine? Cf. Goldstone on Sam 232, that cheaper stuff that matters less than middle-class necessities. The optimist view is Explorers and tourists. <2024-01-01 Mon 11:15> A new world has been created in my lifetime. ****** Ma72: Refugees and Immigrants (pessimism) pending ****** [[file:~/dotfiles/RETRAICE/PODCASTS--working/SEGMENTS/Ma70-SEGMENT/Ma70--LIVENOTES.org::*Dead reckoning][Ma70:]] Explorers and Tourists (optimisim) #+begin_quote The main question is about ‘those others’: Are they explorers, who want to do what I’ve done, or are they tourist, who want to see what I’ve seen? Other questions that arise: To get to where you are, what would have been useful to you, had it existed? To get to where you want to go, what would be useful to you now? Where are you? Where do you want to go? What did you have to do? What will you have to do? #+end_quote ****** [[file:~/dotfiles/RETRAICE/PODCASTS--working/SEGMENTS/Ma69-SEGMENT/Ma69--LIVENOTES.org::*Satisfying the two-sided market][Ma69:]] #+begin_quote ,* Satisfying the two-sided market # times: # The main thing What I need to do (in order to do business, in order to live) is reconcile what’s valuable to me with what’s valuable to others. I think this means making what I find valuable _find-able_ and _usable_ _to others_ — those others, in particular, who would find what I’m doing valuable if only those two conditions were met. [cite/a/b:@MaSeg36]: “First, do valuable things at all; second, once you're doing valuable things, accelerate.” I have to make what I’m doing _objectively better_, i.e. obviously good, true and valuable. [cite/a/b:@MaSeg67]: _Objectively better_ means it should be obvious, to me /and to others/, that my changes (project objectives) are good, true and useful (valuable). (Cf. [cite/a/b:@ReSeg28].) [cite/a/b:@MaSeg68]: _Faster_ means more change, per unit time, of things worth changing, i.e. completion of those obviously good, true and valuable objectives. #+end_quote * Margin ** [source] # need to dig up saved RSS, cuz not on libsyn anymore (cost cutting) # directory: [[file:~/dotfiles/RETRAICE/RETRAICE-INC/archive/SHUTDOWNS-Margin-Merit-and-Means-AmyAtRetraice/]] #+begin_src shell ➜ 2023-12-29-Friday--10:51:15 MARGIN-FREE-shutdown pwd /Users/jeffre/dotfiles/RETRAICE/RETRAICE-INC/archive/SHUTDOWNS-Margin-Merit-and-Means-AmyAtRetraice/MARGIN-FREE-shutdown ➜ 2023-12-29-Friday--10:51:21 MARGIN-FREE-shutdown cat feeds.libsyn.com_302780_publicfeed.txt| grep "<title>" <title>Margin by Retraice Margin by Retraice Ma22: Delusion Hunting 2 - The Rest Ma21: Delusion Hunting 1 - Content Delivery Ma20: Dreams and Delusions Ma19: The Toolchain Ma18: The Website Ma16: November 2020 to February 2022 [spot] Ma15: Two Threats [spot] Ma14: Dilemmas of Automation Ma13: Architecture Is a Hypothesis Ma12: Quitting Your Day Job Ma11: Month-End for October 2020 (Part 2) Ma10: Month-End for October 2020 (Part 1) Ma9: A Tale of Two Banks Ma8: Revolution Before Evolution Ma7: Reading and Writing Ma6: The Back Foot Ma5: Nobody Cares Ma4: Assumptions (A Wrestling Match) Ma3: It’s Not About Love Ma2: Guessing Before Feedback Ma1: Intro to Margin; QC'ing Retraice ➜ 2023-12-29-Friday--10:51:23 MARGIN-FREE-shutdown #+end_src #+begin_src shell ➜ 2023-12-29-Friday--10:52:05 MARGIN-PAID-shutdown pwd /Users/jeffre/dotfiles/RETRAICE/RETRAICE-INC/archive/SHUTDOWNS-Margin-Merit-and-Means-AmyAtRetraice/MARGIN-PAID-shutdown ➜ 2023-12-29-Friday--10:52:09 MARGIN-PAID-shutdown cat feeds.libsyn.com_302795.txt | grep "" <title>Margin Paid Margin Paid Ma17: Addendum---Thinking and Computing Ma16: November 2020 to February 2022 Ma15: Two Threats ➜ 2023-12-29-Friday--10:52:19 MARGIN-PAID-shutdown #+end_src ** [PLANNED] *** After Ma38 **** Everything free is an ad Ads are everywhere: email, apps, sites, radio, TV, games, print, roads, buildings, speech (hidden paid promotions).... _Advertising_ is when one business buys the attention of an audience from another business and uses it for marketing. _Marketing_ is about finding or creating prospective customers. _Propaganda_ is about deliberately spreading [not information, which necessarily connects to reality] [not thoughts, ideas, beliefs] ... what? **** Focus on progress, i.e. making things work; go faster Things, from software to entities to self, should be made to work (by your definition of ‘working’). Focus on this. Go faster. [After seeing the "Suggestion to create consciousness: simulate pain #1284" on aimacode/aima-python] ... He seems nutty, but long-time GH account, couple dozen followers. Which made me think of those GH accounts with green squares throughout the days and years. ... Go faster. Get back to green squares. It starts by building /for/ and /with/ others. *** After Ma37 Just do valuable work better. JDVWB. The ‘just’ is (?) about focus: i.e. ‘the mere thing you have to do’ and ‘the single thing you should do’? First, do valuable things: It is very hard to know what to do. Then, accelerate: Bully yourself? And is faster the same as better? *** [Ma37] Backlog series *** [Ma27] Solopreneur series **** Ma3_: Delusion is Nature's Strategy, Not Yours #+begin_src shell TitlePhraseRaw="Delusion is Nature's Strategy, Not Yours" LivestreamOnXdotRaw="We can’t adopt the delusions that would benefit us because we can’t adopt delusions." #+end_src ***** recall: Ma31 Upshot There should be some way of understanding delusions that explains why a single delusion can lead one person to succeed and another person to fail. Shouldn’t all delusions be associated with failure? Why are some delusions useful and good, while others are the opposite? ***** Entrepreneurs and solopreneurs Some delusions are useful, and therefore good. Most are probably not. ****** Entrepreneurs - [X] aspiring rich or powerful or both / Ma28 - [-] becoming singular experts in a single business / Ma29 - [X] First, you’re competing for everything / Ma30 - [-] must be delusional about the right things, not the wrong - [X] delusions / Ma31 - [ ] vital and lethal delusions—Nature’s competition / Ma_ - [ ] Second, reality is hidden / Ma_ - [ ] Third, there are implications of hyperspecialization / Ma_ - [ ] ruthless prioritizers; Hamming half-life - [ ] ‘succeeding’ or ‘failing’; successful or failed - [ ] dependent on preparation and opportunity: luck ****** Solopreneurs - [ ] system architects - must simplify! "Note for later: Solopreneurs are particularly fragmented; their brains can only be as simple (focused, clear) as the business they create." Ma32 - [ ] more or different ruthless prioritizers - [ ] software Jacks (of all trades) # did I forget to talk about this? - [ ] shame? - [ ] state or trait? by choice or by nature? ***** Abstract A solopreneur is a kind of entrepreneur, which is a kind of motivated, hyperspecialized, competitor. Entrepreneurs have a tricky problem to solve: to dispel lethal delusions while leaving vital delusions intact. Lethal delusions will kill a business. But without vital delusions, the business will never live in the first place. ***** Nature is in charge The analogy to _natural selection_: /If we are well-deluded, we are ‘fit’ in the relevant environment, and will thrive./[cite:@HoffmanTheCaseAgainstReality2019] You don’t choose delusions; delusions choose /you/. Like genes (memes)?[cite:@DawkinsTheSelfishGene2016AutoGenerated] _Nature_ is trying to do something with us. (Who knows what.) Part of Nature’s strategy is delusions, and /it/ is in charge of which ones overtake us. We can _dispel_ delusions, once we have them. The question is: _Should we_, in any given case? _Stay deluded about the right things_, entrepreneur. ***** Vital and lethal delusions _Delusion_: "(b) psychology: a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary" ([[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/delusion][Merriam-Webster]]) _Vital delusion_: a false belief necessary for success. E.g.: ultra-confidence, hyper-optimism, ’reality-distortion fields’. _Lethal delusion_: a failure-causing false belief. E.g.: ‘the money will come’, ‘there’s plenty of time’, most thoughts that begin with ‘somehow’. _Anti-delusion_: a method that dispels delusions. E.g.: brutal honesty, ruthless prioritization, savage intolerance of nonsense and waste. (But remember: these can destroy both lethal /and vital/ delusions.) ***** Blind spot: You can’t know a belief is a delusion Delusions are beliefs that you think are true, but aren’t. So, if you (really do) re-class a belief as a delusion, you stop believing it’s true. Then it’s no longer a delusion. ***** Upshot Entrepreneurs must hope they have all the /vital/ delusions, and then root out all the /deadly/ ones. In delusion hunting, the trick is knowing your targets. **** Ma3_: Second, Reality is hidden # TITLE: To Get Real, You Become a Hyperspecialist - There's no general theory of business, except "figure out what the people (would) want, and give it to them." But: - which people? - "give it to them" is wrong; "capture it's value"? **** Ma3_: Third, There are implications So What? - The implications: - educational path: - job description: expert in hypothetical company - career path: a series of construction projects - metrics of success: - profit in dollars - profit margin percentage *** [Ma36] Agility (‘Agile Manifesto’ and 12 Principles) These ideas are not just for software. https://agilemanifesto.org/ **** Manifesto 1. /Individuals and interactions over processes and tools/ # better 2. /Working software over comprehensive documentation/ # valuable 3. /Customer collaboration over contract negotiation/ # better 4. /Responding to change over following a plan/ # valuable [W]hile there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more. **** Principles 1) /Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software./ # valuable 2) /Welcome changing requirements, even late in development. Agile processes harness change for the customer's competitive advantage./ # valuable 3) /Deliver working software frequently, from a couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a preference to the shorter timescale./ # better 4) /Business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project./ # better 5) /Build projects around motivated individuals. Give them the environment and support they need, and trust them to get the job done./ # better 6) /The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation./ # better 7) /Working software is the primary measure of progress./ # valuable 8) /Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely./ # better 9) /Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility./ # better 10) /Simplicity--the art of maximizing the amount of work not done--is essential./ # better 11) /The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams./ # better 12) /At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior accordingly./ # better